News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Growers lose control 

Growers lose control

11 Sep, 2008 09:28 AM
WHEAT growers have lost control of AWB with four of the agribusiness’ directors resigning after the company's dual class share structure was scrapped last week.

The four grower directors – including Lockhart grower Roger Schirmer – resigned on Tuesday after AWB Ltd chairman Brendan Stewart asked for the A-class directors who opposed the recent changes to resign.

Peter Cannon, chairman of the Wheat Growers Action Group, which opposed the changes, told The Rural he believed the directors did what they could in trying to protect growers' interests.

“I think the directors that stood their ground did so because they thought growers would be worse off,” Mr Cannon said.

“I commend them for their stance and I think most growers would agree.”

Mr Cannon said he was very disappointed by the loss of the A-class shares, which were held by wheat growers and conferred different rights than those held by B-class shareholders, and said he believed their removal would pave the way for future takeovers.

“We feel two or three years down the track we’ll discover what we've lost,” Mr Cannon said.

“We’ve lost control of AWB. It’s not until we get a few harvests under our belt that we will be able to be strong players again.”

AWB Ltd succeeded in gaining sufficient support to scrap its dual-class share structure, on its third attempt, after A-class shareholders voted at a meeting in Melbourne last week.

The vote was carried by 77 per cent of voting A-class shareholders with more than 44 per cent of A-class shareholders participating in the vote, up from 22 per cent in a previous meeting two weeks ago.

AWB says ending its dual-class share structure will make it easier for the company to compete in the deregulated wheat export market.

Mr Stewart said last week that the end to the A-class shares meant that seven A-class directors on AWB’s board of 12 would have to retire at an extraordinary meeting to approve a new commercial constitution later this year.

But Mr Stewart said the board members who opposed constititional change should go now.

“The question is whether

those directors whose positions have been so overwhelmingly rejected by both the A and

B-class shareholders in general meetings, and by the A-class

shareholders here today – whether it continues to be both moral and ethical for them to draw a remuneration package from those shareholders who have rejected their proposition,” he said. “I think not.”

Mr Stewart said it would be up to the remaining board members to assess the future size of the board, but he envisaged that the board might comprise seven to nine members, with two directors to have agricultural backgrounds.

The four grower directors could not be reached for comment.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 1%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 7%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 3%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 1%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



The Rural







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...